August 21, 2014
Court declines Mass. buffer zone appeal
Posted on Mar 31, 2010 | by Staff

Email this Story

My Name*:
My Email*:
  Enter list of email recipients, one address per box
Recipient 1*
Recipient 2
Recipient 3
Recipient 4
Recipient 5
To fight spam-bots, we need to verify you're a real human user.
Please enter your answer below:
Who was the first woman?
  * = Required Fields Close
WASHINGTON (BP)--Sidewalk counselors will have to remain at least 35 feet from abortion clinics in Massachusetts after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider a challenge to the state's restriction on such pro-life activity.

The high court, without comment, has declined to review a decision by the First Circuit Court of Appeals upholding a 2007 law that barred abortion opponents from discussing abortion with women inside 35 feet of clinic entrances. The appeals court ruled last year the law did not violate pro-lifers' free speech rights, according to the Associated Press.

"The government cannot single them [prolife-life advocates] out for punishment simply because they want to share their message with people entering the clinic," said Michael DePrimo, a lawyer affiliated with the Alliance Defense Fund, when the First Circuit Court heard the appeal. "The government simply cannot create censorship zones where the First Amendment does not apply in order to silence a particular viewpoint."

The Massachusetts state representative who sponsored the bill in 2007, however, said after the Supreme Court's March 22 announcement that the buffer zone statute is "one of my proudest legislative achievements."

Rep. Carl Sciortino of Medford, Mass., told the Medford Transcript daily newspaper, "This law allows protestors to exercise their right to free speech while ensuring individuals accessing health care can do so free from in-your-face intimidation and harassment."

In a report on FOX News, Supreme Court reporter Scott Ross noted, "Anyone who violates the 2007 law is subject to a small fine and up to three months in jail but the law's opponents contend there was no need for the Massachusetts legislature to act. They say there is no record of anyone in Massachusetts who was prosecuted under a previous state law imposing a six-foot perimeter."
Compiled by Baptist Press staff.
Latest Stories
  • Ebola missionary points to faith in Christ after hospital release
  • Reign of terror must be stopped, Moore says
  • Indian villages crack down on Christians
  • Mitchell named Union's chief academic officer
  • Former Baptist youth minister arrested
  • 2nd VIEW: BACK TO SCHOOL: Prep students for missions
  • FIRST-PERSON: The reality of sin & Christian journalism
  • Bible Study: August 24, 2014
  • Add Baptist Press to
    your news reader


     © Copyright 2014 Baptist Press. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use.

    Southern Baptist Convention