August 20, 2014
Loading
   
   
Anti-religion campus policies targeted by ADF
Posted on May 11, 2012 | by Leigh Jones

Email this Story

My Name*:
My Email*:
Comment:
  Enter list of email recipients, one address per box
Recipient 1*
Recipient 2
Recipient 3
Recipient 4
Recipient 5
To fight spam-bots, we need to verify you're a real human user.
Please enter your answer below:
Who was the first woman?
Answer*:
  * = Required Fields Close
SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. (BP) -- The Alliance Defense Fund has launched a nationwide campaign to convince state universities and colleges to change policies that restrict students' First Amendment rights.

Its strategy starts with persuasion but could culminate in lawsuits. The organization of Christian lawyers expects at least a few cases to end up in federal court, which could encourage the nation's highest court to wade into the fray.

"The Supreme Court really needs to step in and clarify for universities that they can't select particular views to censor," said Kevin Theriot, Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) senior counsel.

Theriot and his team have been working on the campaign for about a year, but the group's failure to convince the Supreme Court to hear what many believed would be a seminal case for religious liberty on campus helped bring urgency to the project.

On March 19, the Supreme Court declined to hear ADX v. Reed, a case involving a Christian sorority and fraternity at San Diego State University. The school told the groups they couldn't require leaders to sign a commitment of faith, and the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed. In issuing its ruling, the Ninth Circuit relied heavily on a 2010 Supreme Court ruling in CLS v. Martinez, in which the justices said a state school could create an "all-comers" policy requiring all groups to open membership and leadership to all students.

But the Ninth Circuit did not rule on whether an "all-comers" policy could have exceptions, an issue the ADF and other religious liberty advocates hoped the high court would clear up with ADX v. Reed. The Supreme Court's decision not to hear the case does not mean it agreed with the lower court's ruling. It only means other cases took precedent on the docket.

The ADF hopes to persuade the high court to take up the issue in the future by litigating several similar cases through federal courts around the country. Lawyers from the ADF and The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty are using the same tactic to challenge the contraception mandate included in the new health care law. Legal experts say the high court is more likely to take a case if circuit courts issue contradictory opinions on similar issues.

And the lawyers have plenty of cases to choose from. The CLS v. Martinez ruling has prompted several schools, including Vanderbilt University, in Nashville, Tenn., to adopt what they describe as "all-comers" policies, although administrators apply them selectively.

"It's really targeted toward Christian groups, no doubt about it," he said. "They are the only ones who want to select leaders on the basis of belief. These policies are a poorly disguised attempt to discriminate against religious groups."

Although the Vanderbilt case has received a lot of attention in recent months, it won't be on the ADF's list of offenders. As a private school, Vanderbilt is free to adopt policies that restrict constitutionally protected religious liberties. But plenty of state schools have scrambled to follow Vanderbilt's lead.

ADF lawyers have identified more than 160 public universities with unconstitutional policies. The team sent letters to 40 schools in 23 states in early May in its first volley of challenges. Seventeen of the schools have policies that restrict the freedom of campus Christian groups to select members or leaders. The rest have policies that violate free speech, restrict protest activities to limited areas of campus or exclude religious groups from access to student fee funding.

The group saw its first victory shortly after mailing the first batch of letters. Elizabeth City State University in North Carolina agreed to change its policy limiting student expression to a small wooded area on campus. Courts have come down on the side of protestors in several similar cases in the last year.

The Alliance Defense Fund is just one organization pursuing campus religious liberty cases. Both the Foundation for Individual Liberty in Education (FIRE) and the Christian Legal Society regularly challenge unconstitutional policies. Individual groups facing discrimination on campus also fight attempts by school administrators to stifle their rights. The next case involving a campus Christian group could come from the State University of New York at Buffalo, where the student senate revoked official recognition for InterVarsity Christian Fellowship over violations of the school's nondiscrimination policy.
--30--
Leigh Jones writes for World News Service, where this story first appeared. Get Baptist Press headlines and breaking news on Twitter (@BaptistPress), Facebook (Facebook.com/BaptistPress) and in your email (baptistpress.com/SubscribeBP.asp).
Latest Stories
  • Ukraine's cry for help & hope stirs U.S. churches to pray, go
  • Tilt toward gay marriage hits hiccup
  • BACK TO SCHOOL: Prep students for missions
  • BACK TO SCHOOL: Five tips for parents
  • Flooding, other challenges draw Baptist relief
  • 2nd VIEW: In world missions, pastor says, 'Don't despise small beginnings'
  • FIRST-PERSON: Adam's sin endures in Ferguson
  • FROM THE SEMINARIES: SBTS (Donor gives $1M for church revitalization), NOBTS (religious liberty conference)
  • Add Baptist Press to
    your news reader


       
       


     © Copyright 2014 Baptist Press. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use.


    Southern Baptist Convention